IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CRIMINAL NO.
v. GRAND JURY ORIGINAL
DONALD J. TRUMP, VIOLATIONS:
Defendant. Count 1: 18 U.S.C. § 371
(Conspiracy to Defraud the United
States)
Count 2: 18 U.S.C. § 1512(k)
(Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official
Proceeding)
Count 3: 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(c)(2), 2
(Obstruction of and Attempt to
Obstruct an Official Proceeding)
Count 4: 18 U.S.C. § 241
(Conspiracy Against Rights)
INDICTMENT
The Grand Jury charges that, at all times material to this Indictment, on or about the dates and at the approximate times stated below:
INTRODUCTION
1. The Defendant, DONALD J. TRUMP, was the forty-fifth President of the United States and a candidate for re-election in 2020. The Defendant lost the 2020 presidential election.
2. Despite having lost, the Defendant was determined to remain in power. So for more than two months following election day on November 3, 2020, the Defendant spread lies that there had been outcome-determinative fraud in the election and that he had actually won. These claims were false, and the Defendant knew that they were false. But the Defendant repeated and widely disseminated them anyway—to make his knowingly false claims appear legitimate, create an intense national atmosphere of mistrust and anger, and erode public faith in the administration of the election.
3). The Defendant had a right, like every American, to speak publicly about the election and even to claim, falsely, that there had been outcome-determinative fraud during the election and that he had won. He was also entitled to formally challenge the results of the election through lawful and appropriate means, such as by seeking recounts or audits of the popular vote in states or filing lawsuits challenging ballots and procedures. Indeed, in many cases, the Defendant did pursue these methods of contesting the election results. His efforts to change the outcome in any state through recounts, audits, or legal challenges were uniformly unsuccessful.
4. Shortly after election day, the Defendant also pursued unlawful means of discounting legitimate votes and subverting the election results. In so doing, the Defendant perpetrated three criminal conspiracies:
a. A conspiracy to defraud the United States by using dishonesty, fraud, anddeceit to impair, obstruct, and defeat the lawful federal government functionby which the results of the presidential election are collected, counted, andcertified by the federal government, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371;
b. A conspiracy to corruptly obstruct and impede the January 6 congressional proceeding at which the collected results of the presidential election are counted and certified (“the certification proceeding”), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(k); and
c. A conspiracy against the right to vote and to have one’s vote counted, inviolation of 18 U.S.C. § 241.
Each of these conspiracies—which built on the widespread mistrust the Defendant was creating through pervasive and destabilizing lies about election fraud—targeted a bedrock function of the United States federal government: the nation’s process of collecting, counting, and certifying the results of the presidential election (“the federal government function’).
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/08/01/indictment-document-trump-jan-6-pdf/
3 comments:
Need to know.
Thoughts and prayers will be needed to put that «orange conman» in prison for the American justice system is so slow and biased in its politicised orientation.
Judges are nominated by their political views so there will ever be no real fair trials in USA and surely not when the jury is picked in this or that judicial place.
When Trump will spend only one day in jail, as we say in French, the chickens will have teeth....
I'm eager to see the season finally of all of those cliff hanger indictements....
Not very confident that this conman will go to jail for more than one day because who he is as a wealthy man who's lies spreading is spreading bad ideas to less educated Americans.
American justice is flawed and biased by politic orientation.
With all the evidences Jack Smith had gathered and even if they are breath taking, Trump with his bunch of lawyers will make sure to avoid any condonation.
Did he said in the past that he could kill someone in NYC and had no consequences...
Not new that he is saying he won the 2020 election no matter the proofs of the contrary.
AND honestly, even the 2016 election was a «cheap» win for him as Hilary Clinton did win the popular vote and only the great electors give Trump his victory...
Post a Comment