Must understand as he said that the term «GAY» didn't exist in the ancien world.
Men had a wife for having children and take care of the house and childre. They were having «same sex» encounters for FUN.. Enjoying men to men pleasures...
NO problem for them for having sex with a boy or another man.
If the «Bible» seems to condam «gay behaviours» it must be taken in a context of 2000 years ago...
In another way, Christians say that marriage is for a man and a woman to found a family and have children.. SO, WHY allow old poeple or unfertile couple to marry ??? They will NEVER have children.
It's time to change it (in USA) for LOVE to be THE RULE.. HOT HATE..
Thanks for including. I visit mostly for the excellent visuals, but this kind of thoughtful commentary is certainly welcome, at least for me; I have conservative relatives who might respond to this approach and am glad to have been introduced to it here.
Keep up the good work (and thanks again for the fantastic pics).
Well developped.
ReplyDeleteMust understand as he said that the term «GAY» didn't exist in the ancien world.
Men had a wife for having children and take care of the house and childre.
They were having «same sex» encounters for FUN.. Enjoying men to men pleasures...
NO problem for them for having sex with a boy or another man.
If the «Bible» seems to condam «gay behaviours» it must be taken in a context of 2000 years ago...
In another way, Christians say that marriage is for a man and a woman to found a family and have children..
SO, WHY allow old poeple or unfertile couple to marry ???
They will NEVER have children.
It's time to change it (in USA) for LOVE to be THE RULE.. HOT HATE..
Cheers from Canada.
Thanks for including. I visit mostly for the excellent visuals, but this kind of thoughtful commentary is certainly welcome, at least for me; I have conservative relatives who might respond to this approach and am glad to have been introduced to it here.
ReplyDeleteKeep up the good work (and thanks again for the fantastic pics).