Tuesday, September 8, 2015

Policemen Marry in Spain


http://www.typicallyspanish.com/news-spain/national/The_first_National_Police_gay_wedding.shtml
 

The first National Police gay wedding


National Policemen Chema and Jonathan married on Saturday in the AndalucĂ­a Royal Equestrian School in Jerez de la Frontera

Sep 7, 2015 - 2:31:52 PM

After five years of relationship, Chema from Jerez and Jonathan from Algeciras, were in their best gala uniform and became the first National Police couple to say ‘I do’.

Chema_and_Jonathan.jpg
Chema and Jonathan


‘We are not the first gays in this institution, we have many friends who we known in the force’ said Chema, in an interview granted to Canal Sur Radio, and he hoped their marriage would be another step towards normalisation.

It’s ten year since gay marriage became legal in Spain and although the couple wanted to keep their wedding an intimate and family affair, the social networks got hold of the story including the digital newspaper La Voz del Sur. ‘We didn’t want photos of our gala because we are not exhibitionists’, said Chema who added there should not be any difference between our wedding and for any other couple.

Chema took an optimistic stance and said if the publicity of our wedding does a bit to stop bullying in schools over sexual gender so much the better, and coming out depends on the individual. ‘We have nothing to hide about our profession’.


Chema_and_Jonathan2.jpg


Chema explained he got to know Jonathan at a bad time, after the end of another relationship, ‘and from then we started a relationship which has become a marriage, and now we look forward to our golden anniversary’.

The couple said they would consider remarrying in Church if that ever became possible, but it was Chema who is the believer and takes an active part in the Holy Week celebrations, while Jonathan is a confirmed agnostic.

Neither did they rule out adopting a child; ‘We would have to be very aware of doing so’, said Chema. ‘Gay parents are often more stigmatised, but if you think deeply about it, gay parents often adopt the children whose parents have abandoned them.’

Their honeymoon will be journey across the United States from Seattle to San Diego. 
  

In case there’s still a doubt in anyone's mind


Four Reasons–From A Christian Perspective–Why Kim Davis Is 100% Wrong



“Please…. Your freedom of the press is against my freedom of religion.”
By now, you have probably heard about a County Clerk in a little corner of Kentucky called Rowan County, who has been refusing to issue marriage licences ever since the Supreme Court ruled in favor ofsame-sex marriage. Her name is Kim Davis. In a statement about her refusal, she writes, “To issue a marriage license which conflicts with God’s definition of marriage, with my name affixed to the certificate, would violate my conscience. It is not a light issue for me. It is a Heaven or Hell decision.” She goes on to declare that she will not be stepping down…. “I was elected by the people to serve as the County Clerk. I intend to continue to serve the people of Rowan County, but I cannot violate my conscience.” HERE IS WHY SHE IS EMPIRICALLY, COMPLETELY, OBJECTIVELY, AND, IN ALL OTHER WAYS, 100% WRONG.
  1. This is the face Kim Davis makes when people use their fancy
    This is the face Kim Davis makes when people use their fancy “logic.”
    LOGIC–Imagine you worked at a restaurant, and you believed that God thought drinking alcohol was a sin. Now imagine that the restaurant’s owners decided to start selling alcohol…. As an employee, you are NOT being forced to drink alcohol in violation of your religious liberty. And if you decide that having a job where you sell alcohol to others goes against your moral code, you are free to find another job, right? What you DON’T do is you don’t go into work and refuse to sell people alcohol–claiming “religious freedom”–and expect to keep your job. The same is true if your job is issuing people marriage licenses….
  2. He really does....
    He really does….
    HYPOCRISY–Refusing to issue a marriage license to a couple because you believe the Bible condemns their union is a difficult position for a County Clerk to take without turning into a giant hypocrite. The Bible actually says nothing whatsoever about same-sex marriage. It does say quite a bit about the issue of divorce. It seems to say that if a person gets a divorce for a reason other than infidelity and then remarries, that person is guilty of adultery (that’s one of the big 10!). I wonder how many divorced people Kim Davis has issued marriage licenses to…. Of  course, the Bible has some really interesting things to say to the Church about obeying the rules of their government. But then again, the Bible also says that women shouldn’t be in positions of authority. Yikes!
  3. Rowan County
    Rowan County “Christians” should know better….
    CONFUSION–Kim Davis and her supporters are arguing that forcing her to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples amounts to “Religious Persecution.” These people could not be more confused. It is not religious persecution to tell a person she is not allowed to persecute whole groups of people just because she (mistakenly or otherwise) believes that her religion calls for that persecution. This is the same mentality of the people who are opposing anti-bullying legislation on the grounds that they believe they should be allowed to bully gay kids as a part of the Christian expression of their beliefs. Just because you belong to some freaky “religion” that views forced sex with strangers as an act of worship, it doesn’t give you the right to go around raping people.
  4. I'm usually a pretty compassionate guy, but I'm sorry: Boo-Freaking-Hoo. Do your job.
    I’m usually a pretty compassionate guy, but I’m sorry: Boo-Freaking-Hoo. Do your job.
    INTEGRITY–I once heard Rob Bell say, “Christian is a fantastic noun, and a terrible adjective.” And while that is true, this should still be said: Staying on in a position for which you are refusing to perform the duties you were hired to perform–all while continuing to take a salary–is far from a “Christian” thing to do. It doesn’t matter is you were hired or elected, you agreed to take a position and perform the duties of that position. If–through a change in your own conscience, or a change in the laws of the country–you find yourself unable, in good conscience, to perform the duties your job entails, you DON’T keep taking money while refusing to work. You step down.Let’s say you accepted a position as One Direction’s publicist…. Then God changes your heart to see that their music is just awful and you decide you can’t (in good conscience) talk them up anymore, YOU DON’T refuse to step down but insist on still getting paid for a job you won’t do. That’s not “Christian.” That’s extortion. 
        Do your job.




What happened? Did the world just turn upside down?


Fox Host: Kim Davis’ Lawyer Is ‘Stunningly Obtuse’
by Matt Wilstein | 12:27 pm, September 7th, 2015

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/fox-host-kim-davis-lawyer-is-stunningly-obtuse/


Kim Davis, the Kentucky county clerk who was jailed last week for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, has gotten plenty of sympathy from Republican presidential candidates like Ted Cruz and Mike Huckabee. But on Fox News Monday morning, host Gregg Jarrett and his two guests were in full agreement that Davis deserved to be jailed for not upholding the law and that her lawyer’s arguments in her defense were “stunningly obtuse.”

“When she took the job she swore to uphold the law,” Jarrett said. “We rely on government officials to do that. They can’t just pick and choose what laws they like, which ones they don’t. If they were allowed to do that, wouldn’t that lead to chaos, anarchy and so forth?”

The host and his two guests seized on a statement made Davis’ lawyer Mat Staver that implied the Supreme Court did not have the “constitutional authority” to legalize same-sex marriage.

“Whether the Supreme Court has constitutional authority?” Jarrett asked in disbelief. “Article III Section 2 of the Constitution gives the Supreme Court constitutional authority to decide constitutional issues. Was that a stunningly obtuse statement by her attorney?”

“That’s a very polite way of putting it,” criminal defense attorney Sharon Liko told him. “I would say it’s just a ridiculously stupid statement. The Supreme Court does just that, and they determine constitutionality issues, they resolve these kinds of disputes.”

Watch video below, via Fox News:


Graysexual?


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/this-man-identifies-as-graysexual-heres-what-that-means_55eedd48e4b002d5c07682c5?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices

This Man Identifies As 'Graysexual.' Here's What That Means.

"I’ve been with a lot of guys and the experience has been very similar —
I want to hold them, I want to kiss them but I don’t want to have sex with them."


Noah Michelson
Editorial Director for Voices, The Huffington Post 
Posted: 09/08/2015 11:32 AM EDT

You know what "gay" and "lesbian" and "bisexual" mean. You might even know what"asexual" and "pansexual" mean. But have you ever heard of someone identifying as "graysexual?"

In Christopher Stoudt's new short film, "I'm Graysexual," a young man named Jared explains what it's like to identify as graysexual, a term which exists under the asexuality umbrella and one he defines as a "magical place between asexual and someone who is sexual." As The Frisky put it, "asexuality is often thought of as a spectrum, and gray-sexuality is the in-between -- something more fluid between sexuality and asexuality." Those who identify as graysexual might also identify as gay or straight or any other sexual identity along the binary.

In the clip, Jared, who also identifies as gay, explains, "I used to think I haven’t met the right person but I’ve been with a lot of guys and the experience has been very similar — I want to hold them, I want to kiss them but I don’t want to have sex with them. I don’t want a blow job, I don’t really want to give them a blow job and if they left their underwear on I would be super happy."

He adds, "I hate that I thought of myself as broken. I don’t want to fix myself. I think I’m fine."

In an email to The Huffington Post, Stoudt noted, "It’s not that graysexuals are people with low sex-drives who have sex infrequently; graysexuals would be happy to never have sex again, as long as they live. In this video, you spend a night seeing the world through someone else’s eyes and see the world in a way that you might not have knew existed. They like to miss, they like to snuggle, they like human contact, and might even enjoy masturbating alone… but they don’t want to have sex. It’s not on their agenda."

Stoudt added that he wanted to make the video to reach others who might feel the way that Jared does but didn't realize there was a term for how they identify.

"It’s a relatively new label that, twenty years ago, might have been written off and discounted… but with the power of the internet today to connect people and bring people together, those who don’t view their sexuality as a black-and-white distinction are able to form a community around a label," he said. "Asexuality is all about empowering people with whatever label they feel comfortable with, and I wanted to make a video that gave validity to the graysexual term in the hopes of re-affirming those who felt this way."

For more from Stoudt, have a look at his video series "Cannibal," which features "I'm Graysexual" and other films that explore subcultures and other topics in just 60 seconds.

# # #

So what -- besides horny -- do we call guys who have sex with females but like hanging out with their best buddies and enjoying bro-bro sex?

Vacation in the Tropics Pic of the Day